Web-Stat hit counter

May 3, 2006

Age Graded Tables finally arrive! And we have 'em

WMA veep Rex Harvey today sent me this Microsoft Excel file (updated 5/18/06 to fix M55 shot factor) containing the Age Graded Tables -- factors for multiplying your times or distances to see how they compare with marks in the "Open Class" (generally 20- to 30-year-olds) or any other age group. Officially, these tables are used only for age-grading the multi-events (decathlon, heptathlon, pentathlon, etc.) in the masters world championships. Unofficially, they decide winners in road races, handicap track sprints and a zillion other events -- sometimes with cash at stake. So this is big. And long overdue.

All events and age groups are listed, from 50 meters to 200 kilometers. Plus all the throwing events and jumps. The file can be converted to other formats and exported to other software tools.

I've been following the sorry odyssey of these tables for a while. The gist is this:

The first tables appeared in 1989 and were revised in 1994. But hundreds of age-group records have been set since then, necessitating a major revision. Part of the reason that the revisions are long delayed is a theft that occurred in Long Island, New York. On May 6, 2003, Harvey was checking out of a motel when, among other items, his laptop computers were pilfered. Gone were the age-graded tables –- and the only backup copy.

So it's taken three years to re-create the tables, which involved negotiations between the LDR and T&F factions of masters athletics.

These tables also will be published in booklet form and published by National Masters News. Cost of the hard copy -- which includes a history of the AGT and instructions on their use -- will be reasonable, since the object is to make the tables available as widely as possible.

But the new tables will make it possible for webgeeks to design online forms that allow you to plug in your numbers and click a SUBMIT button to generate your age-graded performance, and also see its age-graded percentage (where 100 percent is world-record level, 90 percent is world-class, 80 percent is national class, and 70 percent is me most of the time -- regional class.)

Canadian hurdle star Jess Brewer has one such lookup form, but it's based on the 1994 tables. (I'll make sure he hears about the new set.)

I haven't analyzed the new AGT to determine the winners and losers. But I guarantee as many people will be unhappy with the new tables as pleased. That's because some events/age grouos will find it "tougher" to score high on the tables. Others will find their marks given more prestige.

Chem 'em out, and let me know where y'all fall in this spectrum.

Meanwhile, mega thanks to Rex and his WMA committee for bringing this project to fruition -- and a finale.

Posted by kenstone at May 3, 2006 7:06 PM
Comments

If the tables keep "tightening" up, by the time the 2050 tables are out, none of my marks will score much above 50% (just kidding). But at this point I definately prefer the 1989 version:

100m 06 94 89
M40(11.76) 87.2% 87.2% 88.2%
M50 (12.1) 90.7% 90.6% 90.0%(better)

400m
M40(52.9) 87.3% 87.8% 88.9%
M50(55.5) 89.2% 90.9% 91.6%

Long Jump
M40(6.02) 74.7% 75.7% 76.1%
M50(5.87) 82.3% 84.5% 83.8%

Posted by: David E. Ortman on May 3, 2006 8:40 PM

I guess I'm not as smart as I'd like to think I am...I can't figure out this table. Can someone help me? Give me an example of how you would determine the proper percentage based on performance.

Thanks

Posted by: Dexter McCloud on May 4, 2006 12:18 AM

Not an expert, but here is how I think it is done:

OC=Row 2, which is current world's best
AgeFact=Factor from big table for given age of athlete
Perf=Performance to be graded
%Perf=Percent performance mark seen in results

%Perf=OC/(Perf*AgeFact)

Example:
A 57 year old male recently ran 17:14 for a 5K road race.
OC=774
AgeFact=0.8254
Perf=17:14 or 1034 seconds

%Perf=774/(1034*0.8254)=0.9069 --> 90.7%

Posted by: mcgato on May 4, 2006 7:33 AM

The 50km walk figures for the older age groups are just plain daft. All of Gerhardt Weidner's times are widely regarded as legendary. (He set a REAL world record at M40). In particular his M60 time of 4h23m29s is regarded as truly exceptional, yet it scores only 95.25% on the new tables. Similarly James Grimwade's M75 time of 5h19m34s, also regarded as legendary, scores only 93.3%. Scoring 100% in the M65/M70 range calls for breaking the current World Records by nearly an hour!! How in the world is this justified? Nobody has got anywhere near 100% over M45.

Posted by: arthur thomson on August 21, 2006 2:06 PM
Post a comment