masterstrack.com

The No. 1 site for masters track discussions

Login | Register

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:23 am

Offline
Master Masters Athlete
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:24 am
Posts: 202
Location: Utrecht (Netherlands)

With age the WMA want us to throw with lighter implements. Is there a theory how the difference effects your distance? My guess is that it goes with the square root of the difference, so throwing a 500 gram javelin goes SQRT(600/500) times the distance with a 600. It fits reasonably on my own distances in javelin, discus and shot.

_________________
regards, Weia



Top Top
  Profile WWW

Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:37 am

 
Offline
Master Masters Athlete
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:24 am
Posts: 202
Location: Utrecht (Netherlands)

No theories? No guesses?

_________________
regards, Weia



Top Top
  Profile WWW

Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:02 pm

 
Offline
Senior Masters Athlete
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 11

I've used the square root of mass formula for a few years with the hammer throw. It's worked well for me. In any given training period it let's me know if I'm slow or weak, relative to my competition implement. Sadly sometimes both.



Top Top
  Profile

Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:34 pm

 
Offline
Senior Masters Athlete
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:04 am
Posts: 19
Location: Mt. Charleston, Nevada

I don't claim to be the originator, but to answer someone's question about this topic, I did once derive that square root of the ratio formula. It depends on two assumptions for its validity. First, that distance thrown is proportional to release velocity. Not strictly true, but at least for the distances involved, not too far off for the non-aerodynamic implements. I never thought of applying the formula to discus or javelin--its interesting that it gives accurate results for some people. The second assumption is that you can give the various weighted implements the same kinetic energy at release. This is close to being true if the weights of the implements are not too much different, and I think is the source of MichaelV's ability to use the formula to analyze his weaknesses. (Although I wouldn't call them weaknesses, he's throwing further than I am.)



Top Top
  Profile

Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:20 pm

 
Offline
Master Masters Athlete
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:27 pm
Posts: 105

Michael V is a good friend. Friends don't let throwers do math.



Top Top
  Profile

Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:52 am

 
Offline
Senior Masters Athlete
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:04 am
Posts: 19
Location: Mt. Charleston, Nevada

Yeah, the story of my life. Always the designated math doer.



Top Top
  Profile

Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:46 am

 
Offline
Master Masters Athlete
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:24 am
Posts: 202
Location: Utrecht (Netherlands)

T&F iiissss math and physics!

_________________
regards, Weia



Top Top
  Profile WWW

Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:40 pm

 
Offline
Senior Masters Athlete
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 11

Rev GJ,

Like Jethro Bodine, I like to think of it as cyphering.

Carl,

Thanks for the additional information. The numbers never worked well for me when I went to light or heavy relative to the comp ball. Your explanation helps me understand why. Good, one less thing to get all worked up over.



Top Top
  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Moderators: Jess, trackinfo, Ken Stone, Larry Barnum


Search for:
Jump to:  
cron