Great 1500s: Aeron Arlin-Genet 4:27.5, Sorensen 3:53.95
Aeron Arlin-Genet took fifth in the women’s invitational 1500 yesterday at UCLA’s Rafer Johnson/Jackie Joyner Kersee Invitational. Aeron’s time of 4:27.50 is a big improvement from her 4:30 in late March. And the results note it as having met the qualifying standard of the NCAA championships. But I doubt she’ll go. She’s 41 and used up her collegiate eligibility a while back. But it’s cool to see her spanking the collegians. A 4:27.50 is an incredible time at her age, with the Age-Graded Tables saying it corresponds to an open (ages 20-30) effort of 4:10.43. Aeron tweeted her UCLA time: “As for the 1500 kicked some young ass got 5th. Season pr of 4:27.5. headin in right direction. wanted more (always!). But overall good show.” Good show indeed, Aeron. Keep kicking kiddie butt! Meanwhile at the Woody Wilson Classic up at UC Davis, Jim Sorensen, who turns 42 in mid-May, ran the 15 in 3:53.95. His AGT is 3:37.55, and it’s roughly equivalent to a 4:11 mile! (Jim holds the M40 WR at 3:44.06.)
Aeron’s race:
3 Responses
Jim,
I had never seen you race before yesterday. I am not sure how many collegians you passed before placing third but your final 500 meters was something to behold. It my pleasure to announce your race!
Welcome back Jim!! That is what we like to see.
Jim Sorensen, as I said after watching him at the Hartshorne Mile in January, is one crazy kicker. And Aeron Arlin Genet is something else.
Incidentally, Aeron not only bettered the NCAA standard in the 1500; she broke the listed American mark of 4:32.73 by Joan Nesbit with plenty of time to spare. Of course, I believe this is the 7th time that Aeron has broken this mark.
Superstars Ruth Wysocki and Alisa Harvey have also broken the 4:32.73 mark. In fact, at an absolute minimum, the record has been broken 11 times. And yet, the record book gives no indication of any marks that are even “pending.” How can that be possible?
This is of personal interest to me, because on July 12 at Oshkosh I will be announcing the W40 1500 at the outdoor nationals. What should I do if someone breaks the listed mark of 4:32.73 but does not break all 11 of the superior marks?
For the record, rather than say “That’s a new record” or “that’s a record,” I have decided to say: “That breaks the listed mark of 4:32.73.” But why should I have to be thinking in those terms? Why is it that in masters T&F one cannot simply look at the record book to get the answers?
Leave a Reply