How Barry Bonds made the top news at USATF meeting
Bob Weiner has been generating publicity for his Washington clients for many years, so he knows what buttons to push. As the USATF Masters Media subcommittee chair, he also ramps up his PR shop twice a year to draw attention to indoor and outdoor masters nationals. Make that three times a year. In late November, a column he wrote for a Honolulu daily attracted as much press for USATF’s annual meeting as all the athlete honorees put together. Bob wrote: “It’s time for baseball to delete the asterisk from Barry Bonds’ records and do what USA Track and Field and the Olympics would do — remove his records altogether.”
Conflating baseball and track is a stretch — but Bob’s commentary hit a nerve. And it rocketed around the world for a couple news cycles.
The Associated Press made his column “news” in itself — even as it incorrectly gave his title. Sports Illustrated and The Sporting News featured his argument on their Web sites.
I wrote Bob the other day to learn whether this column (out of the dozens he’s written over the years) made the biggest splash in his memory.
Bob replied: “It was terrific, but I often get a lot of play from our opeds on all subjects — prison abuse, Social Security, when I did Ken Starr stuff after (being) subpoenaed” when “we made (the) lead of Brokaw and Jennings,” and “(wife) Pat and I were interviewed on the ‘Today’ show and ‘Good Morning America.’ So no, not the biggest but yes it was amazing for what it was.”
(From Bob’s Web site: “While I worked at the White House Drug Policy Office, my wife, Pat, and I were among over 100 Clinton staffers, Secret Service agents, friends, and associates victimized by Starr’s subpoenas and demands to testify in front of his Grand Jury — on January 30, 1998.)
At the USATF convention, Bob writes, reference to his Barry Bonds column “came across CNN on TV right during the MTF party with Roe and (USATF CEO Craig) Masback there. Tom Surber (a USATF press aide) separately saw that happen as he was watching in his room, called (press chief) Jill (Geer), and told me it was amazing.
“That morning Roe actually took the piece to the plenary, held it up and showed it and read the headline to everyone at the opening session, and cited it and me for the right message. It was very gratifying.”
Whether or not you agree that Barry’s records should be spiked, there’s no debate over Bob’s ability to take a stand with high-profile potential. Nice job, Bob.
Here’s the column in case the link goes dead:
Bonds, too, should be going, going, gone
If Barry Bonds were subject to the rules of track and field — America’s premier Olympic sport, holding its national convention in Honolulu this week — his home-run records would be “going, going, gone,” as famed announcer Mel Allen used to say as the ball sailed out of the park. There would be no asterisk — Bonds’ record would be annulled. Henry Aaron would be given back his hard-fought 1974 record of 755 — and that’s just what baseball should do.
For participants in the USA Track and Field Convention — national, state and local association chairpersons, meet organizers, officials, coaches and athletes young and old — no decision or action will have more impact than maintaining a strong anti-drug policy for our nation’s youth, especially approaching the Beijing Olympics.
Bonds has increased his hat, shoe and chest sizes by 25 percent during the last 10 years, from ages 33-43, not exactly a young boy’s growing period. Time magazine reported Bonds’ swelling up as “a telltale sign of human growth hormone,” or HGH. For him to say he didn’t “knowingly” take drugs defies what everyone knows that human growth hormone and steroids do.
After a positive test result, Bonds publicly admitted (Associated Press and ESPN, Jan. 10 and 11) taking amphetamines, but predictably claimed he didn’t know what it was when he got it from a teammate. Still baseball did not penalize him.
Bonds was indicted this month for perjury and objection of justice for testifying before a federal grand jury in 2003 that he never used performance-enhancing drugs.
Baseball players and coaches downplay amphetamine pills as unimportant “greenies” despite the aggressive, criminal and suicidal tendencies they engender when not medically monitored.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control report that one million student athletes say they have taken steroids. After former St. Louis Cardinals’ home run hitter Mark McGwire tested positive for Androstenedione or “Andro” (now labeled a steroid), sales of the drug quadrupled, confirming a Kaiser Foundation finding that three-quarters of kids say they look up to and want to emulate professional athletes.
Before children start taking steroids and HGH, they need to be aware of the real harm and dangerous side effects, including liver and heart disease, cancer, shrunken body parts, hair in the wrong places, suicide (many sad parents recently testified before Congress) and, as the family of wrestler Chris Benoit can attest, paranoid, schizophrenic, murderous rages. Thousands of East German swimmers are now suing the current government for illnesses from forced steroid drugging.
USA Track and Field, led by CEO Craig Masback and National Chairman Bill Roe, has a “zero tolerance” policy for performance-enhancing drugs and the most rigorous testing program in sport. The punishment of at least a two-year ban from competition and the annulment of results hurts, and is imposed even if the illegal users are stars such as Olympic quintuple-medalist Marion Jones or 100-meter world record holder Tim Montgomery. Only in track and field is the entire entourage — coaches, doctors, trainers, assistants — equally subject to being banned. .
Major League Baseball, on the other hand, has a “zero action” policy: do nothing unless boxed into a corner. It does not record tests for amphetamines, it secretly announces to teams at least a day before when “unannounced” steroid testers are coming (allowing players to disappear or use drug-masking agents) and does not seek information about HGH. The MLB investigation into steroid use now being conducted by former Sen. George Mitchell of Maine will provide generalities but no real action — and no unknown names will be named, according to the ground rules. Professional football, hockey, basketball and soccer are not much better — the objective of all pro sports seems to be to hide rather than block and punish drug abuse.
In helping to create the new World and U.S. Anti-Doping Agencies, former drug czar and retired four-star general Barry McCaffrey urged “open, accountable” drug policies that the world could see, hear and know. McCaffrey, outgoing WADA Chairman Dick Pound, and former USADA Chairman and Olympic marathon champion Frank Shorter — the triumvirate who launched the struggle against sports drug abuse — forcefully asserted that the era of hiding our embarrassments must be over. Youths must see and hear the point of drug-free athletics.
It’s been a bad year for high-profile sports drug busts — not just Jones and Bonds, but Tour de France leader Michael Rasmussen and ex-Wimbledon tennis champion Martina Hingis among many others — but it’s been a good year for letting the world know that drugs in sport are unacceptable. Every bust is a message to kids: Do not cheat.
It’s appalling for Bonds to assert, “This record is in no way tainted.” It’s time for baseball to delete the asterisk from Barry Bonds’ records and do what USA Track and Field and the Olympics would do — remove his records altogether. It’s time for other sports, sponsors and the media to step up and help. Because of the powerful symbolism of the baseball home-run record — like no other — it’s the best way baseball can restore its integrity and join track and field in sending a loud and clear message for drug-free sport to youths and the nation.
4 Responses
First and foremost to Bob for getting some positive message out there, both for T&F and for the anti-drug message in general.
I don’t think we have found the answer yet. At least we in T&F purge old accomplishments of our pariahs. But will that really stop potential cheaters? Our size is to our advantage. The majority of our elite athletes don’t make enough money to . . . eat, much less support themselves off the income from our sport.
There is still motivation. If they could just move up a slight notch, the winners can afford a much better lifestyle compared to the folks in lane 8. If a pill or a shot can get them there, the potential of money tests a person’s honesty.
In sports with more money, there is even more temptation. Its not just on the top level. Bonds may have taken himself artificially from a superb athlete into the stratosphere. Look at lower levels. Every benchwarmer in MLB or the NBA makes at least six and more likely seven figures. Is that motivation to cheat–to get there?
Take your average NFL or NBA player–if you are freakishly large with any athletic coordination at all, there is a job for you. Does Human Growth Hormone help one become freakishly large? 7’0″ or 300 Lbs. is a great calling card for employment. If you just don’t cut it, there is always professional wrestling.
Carry that down further. If poor 9-5 daddy knows his son will get a free university education if he can grow him up to those standards, they start feeding them like beef cattle starting in 6th grade. Earl Woods is not the only father who aspires to make their son the greatest athlete in the world–how many will do it “by any means necessary?”
Then there is the fame. An Olympic athlete may aspire to the Wheaties box or their 15 minutes of fame on Leno, Letterman, The Today Show or GMA. Can we ever figure out how to take that away? Does the shot of them being led into the courtroom in handcuffs erase that? Do these people think that far down the road? Can someone of such a small mind ever be convinced by FloJo or Lyle Alzado in a box?
The fame reward could work even on a much smaller level. Some people are enthralled to be mentioned on the front of the sports section in their local bird cage bottom. Or just the smiling proud papa on the sideline. And just being the on the football team could mean “potential” in the most important thing to a high school boy–girls.
As long there is any short term reward to cheating, there will be people who do it to get ahead. How much of this can we possibly hope to prevent by drug testing?
Well, as I was sitting in the stands in Riccione watching our sprinters winning gold medals, I heard the word ?¢‚ǨÀúdrug-cheaters?¢‚Ǩ‚Ñ¢ in English, German, Italian, Spanish and guessed the same word in a variety of Eastern European languages. Finally, I got so annoyed at a German bore that I tore him a new one. His defense was simple: ?¢‚Ǩ?ìDo you drug test masters athletes like we do in Germany? Dopers will get their two years minimum and we still catch a few each year. And you are telling me that in the epicenter of cheaters (the US) all athletes are clean? In the absence of testing, all American athletes are suspect. You?¢‚Ǩ‚Ñ¢re naive, dumb. Shut up and sit down.?¢‚Ǩ¬ù
By not testing we are protecting few dishonest athletes, but hurting many honest athletes because suddenly everybody is suspicious. If you are not taking anything illegal, speak up for testing. We can afford few random tests and we will not have the reputation of being drugged up grandmothers and grandfathers.
I am in favor of testing at our National Masters meets. Perhaps we need to add a surcharge to cover the cost of testing a handful at each national masters track meet. There are those who cheat – occasionally a masters cheat is caught at a major road race- but usually in the younger masters age group of distance runners.
I have been around this sport long enough to have heard the rumors, seen the sudden amazing change in appearance of a few folks, and wondered about the sudden increase in speed, distance, height, etc. I take the time and effort to turn in a TUE for international competition every two years and would certainly do it annually if necessary. And frankly I wonder about some of the supplements that are being used and marketed to masters athletes and promoted by some masters athletes.
They may be fine but I have no clue as the folks using them do not necessarily compete internationally and if they do- seldom if ever chosen for testing. If we start testing then perhaps the remarkable performance of some of our American masters athletes will be respected in Europe and those who do cheat may have to skip the US national masters meets too.
This is one grandmother who welcome testing.
Leave a Reply